Formative Assessment: what it represents

Formative assessment refers to a set of practices, techniques, and activities employed to evaluate learning in progress. Through formative assessment, teachers or instructors receive feedback from students to understand their perception of the material and, consequently, adjust the curriculum and differentiate instruction to make it more personalized.
Formative assessment assists students in developing valuable skills, such as reflection, information processing, self-evaluation, and goal-setting. It also encourages independence in learning and teaching.
A grade itself is not informative. For instance, if a student makes 30 errors in a dictation test and receives a grade of two, it may indicate that he or she has made progress, but the grade does not reflect the student’s development or the effectiveness of the program. Moreover, this grade may demotivate the student.
This does not imply that the marking system is fundamentally flawed. It merely refers to the final evaluation – that is, it does not discuss the process but rather the outcome. It can also be part of formative assessment and does not contradict it. You can always assign points for completed tasks and then calculate a final grade from them.
Formative assessment is appropriate for both children and adults. Assessment methods for different age groups do not vary significantly. However, the earlier these practices are introduced, the better.
Nevertheless, there may initially be challenges with children, as such assessment will require specific skills from students – for instance, analyzing their work and the ability to ask questions. Although these are highly beneficial but complex cognitive abilities, with consistent use, results can be achieved relatively quickly. From educators and teachers, the formative assessment system requires, first, skills, and, secondly, time resources. This is because the basis of formative assessment is criterion-based assessment. That is, for specific tasks, modules, topics, etc., it is necessary to establish certain evaluation criteria – the educational outcomes that the student has achieved. These can be at different levels – for example, beginner, intermediate, and advanced. It is the creation of these criteria that often presents difficulties and requires significant time.
01.02.2024News
- Test news 23.12.2024
- Professional Development Courses for Russian Language and Mathematics Teachers Held in Dushanbe, Republic of Tajikistan 18.12.2024
- From November 24 to 26, 2024, the Annual International Conference of the Center for International Cooperation in Education Development (CICED) was held in Yerevan, Armenia, under the theme “SAM Methodology: Advancing Educational Practices, Improving Pedagogical Approaches, and Developing Promising Diagnostic Tools.” 03.12.2024
- In November, in the city of Minsk, Republic of Belarus, in-person seminars on the professional development program for teachers based on the SAM (Student Achievement Monitoring) diagnostic tool were successfully conducted 25.11.2024
- Development and Localization of the Express Version of the Diagnostic Tool for Primary School Teachers’ Pedagogical Practices in Central Asian Countries 22.11.2024
- Project on Implementing Educational Modules to Improve Academic Performance and Address Learning Gaps Among Schoolchildren 19.11.2024
- Seminars on the Teacher Professional Development Program Held in Bishkek, Kyrgyz Republic 18.11.2024
- International Comparative Monitoring: Modern Student Competencies and Assessment Methods Across CIS Countries 11.11.2024
- Professional Development Courses for Russian Language and Mathematics Teachers Held in Bishkek, Kyrgyz Republic 21.10.2024
- Diagnostic Tool for Evaluating Teachers’ Pedagogical Practices 10.10.2024






